Linear Review 2026: Linear is a keyboard-first issue tracker built for product and engineering teams that value speed and focus over deep customization. This review breaks down pricing, key features, real pros and cons, and the best alternatives—so you can decide quickly whether Linear fits your workflow or if tools like Jira or Shortcut are a better match.
Review Policy & Methodology
Why You Can Trust This Review
- No paid placements: Rankings and recommendations are not influenced by vendor payments.
- Evaluation criteria: We assess speed/UX, workflow fit, integrations, reporting, security/admin, AI usefulness, and total cost.
- Update process: Pricing and security claims are verified against official sources before each revision.
- Limitations disclosed: We did not have access to Enterprise pricing quotes or production AI features. Entitlements by plan are stated only where confirmed in official docs.
Linear is a fast, keyboard-driven issue tracker built for product and engineering teams who value speed and focus over configurability. It’s best for teams of 5–200 who ship software weekly and want a clean, opinionated workflow. If you need deep customization, complex workflows, or portfolio-level reporting, Linear may feel limiting.
TL;DR Verdict – Linear Review 2026
| Best For | Product/engineering teams (5–200) prioritizing speed, Slack/GitHub integration, clean UX |
|---|---|
| Not For | Large enterprises needing portfolio management, heavy compliance workflows, or deep customization |
| Top Alternatives | Jira (customization, ecosystem), Shortcut (balanced flexibility), GitHub Issues (native dev workflow) |
| Bottom Line | Linear is one of the fastest, most pleasant issue trackers for software teams—but not the most flexible or cheapest at scale. |
Linear at a Glance
| Attribute | Summary |
|---|---|
| What It Is | Modern issue tracker and product delivery platform |
| Best For | Product teams, startups, engineering orgs (5–200 users) |
| Pricing | Free–$16/user/month (Business); Enterprise is custom |
| Top Strengths | Speed, keyboard-first UX, Slack/GitHub integration, clean design |
| Key Limitations | Limited customization, narrower integration ecosystem, light portfolio reporting |
| Security | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA on request), SAML/SCIM, audit logs (last 3 months) |
| Data Regions | US or EU (chosen at workspace creation) |
Read more: 20 Best Team Collaboration Tools Reviewed for 2026
What Is Linear?
Linear is a product and engineering issue tracker designed as a faster, simpler alternative to legacy project management tools like Jira. Its core philosophy: speed and focus. Linear is built for teams that want to spend less time configuring workflows and more time shipping software.
Linear’s interface is intentionally opinionated. You won’t find endless customization menus—instead, you get sensible defaults, a keyboard-first experience, and a UI designed to feel extremely fast in daily use. It’s popular with startups, growing SaaS companies, and mid-sized engineering teams who value developer experience.
Linear competes directly with Jira, Shortcut, and GitHub Issues in the issue tracking space. Unlike broader project management platforms like Asana or ClickUp, Linear focuses specifically on issue tracking, sprint/cycle planning, and roadmaps for product delivery rather than general-purpose work management.

Linear Features Deep Dive
Core Issue Tracking & Workflows
Linear’s issue system is clean and responsive. Every action—creating, moving, filtering, assigning—can be done via keyboard shortcuts. The triage workflow is particularly well-designed: new issues enter a “Triage” state, so nothing lands directly in your backlog without review.
Key points:
- Views & Filters: Custom saved views, filtering by assignee, label, project, cycle, priority, and more.
- Keyboard Navigation: Nearly every action has a shortcut. Power users rarely touch the mouse.
- Statuses: Configurable per-team, but not infinitely flexible (by design).
- Labels, Priorities, Estimates: Standard fields; estimates are optional and can use T-shirt sizing or points.
- Bulk Actions: Multi-select and batch update issues easily.
Trade-off: If you need complex custom fields, approval gates, or non-linear workflows (e.g., issues that branch and merge), Linear will feel restrictive. Teams with those requirements often prefer Smartsheet for its spreadsheet-style flexibility or Jira for workflow customization.
Cycles, Projects & Roadmaps
Linear uses “Cycles” as its sprint equivalent—time-boxed periods (typically 1–2 weeks) for planning and tracking work.
- Cycles: Automated rollover of incomplete issues, velocity tracking, and cycle reports.
- Projects: Group related issues across cycles. Projects have progress tracking and can be linked to roadmaps.
- Roadmaps: Visual timeline view for planning quarters or releases. Useful for communicating with stakeholders.
- Initiatives (Business+): Higher-level grouping for strategic goals spanning multiple projects.
Decision rule: If your team runs sprints and wants lightweight velocity tracking, Cycles work well. If you need Gantt-style dependencies or complex release trains, Linear’s roadmaps may be too simple.
Integrations (Slack, GitHub, Zendesk)
Linear’s integration ecosystem is focused, not sprawling. The Slack and GitHub integrations are deep; others are more limited.
Slack Integration:
- Create issues directly from Slack messages.
- Use
/linearcommands to search, assign, and update issues. - Thread sync: comments can be configured to sync between Linear and linked Slack threads.
- Rich unfurls and notifications.
- Linear Agent for Slack (Business/Enterprise): An AI agent that can triage, answer questions, and route issues from Slack.
- Multiple Slack workspaces: Supported on Enterprise only.
Source: https://linear.app/docs/slack
GitHub Integration:
- Bi-directional sync can be configured: issues update when PRs are opened, merged, or closed.
- Automatic status transitions are typically supported (e.g., move to “In Review” when PR is opened)—validate in your trial.
- Linked commits and branches.
Zendesk & Intercom (Business+):
Link support tickets to Linear issues for customer-facing triage. Useful for closing the loop between support and product. For teams heavily invested in Zendesk workflows, see our Zendesk vs Intercom comparison for context on how these platforms differ.
Trade-off: Linear’s integration list is narrower than Jira’s broad app marketplace. Linear supports Slack and GitHub natively; additional integrations vary—confirm availability in official docs or via API/Zapier for your specific toolchain.
Reporting & Visibility
Linear offers built-in analytics, but reporting depth is limited compared to enterprise tools.
- Linear Insights (Business+): Cycle reports, project progress, team velocity, issue aging.
- Dashboards (Enterprise only): Customizable dashboards for leadership visibility.
- Activity Logs: See who did what and when.
Scannable facts:
- Cycle burndown charts are standard.
- Custom reporting is limited; no ad-hoc SQL or BI export (use API for that).
- Dashboards require Enterprise—most teams won’t have access.
Decision rule: If your leadership demands custom executive dashboards or portfolio-level analytics, expect to export data via API or upgrade to Enterprise.
Automation & AI
Linear has invested heavily in automation and AI, especially for Business and Enterprise tiers.
- Workflow Automations: Trigger actions on status changes, assignments, label additions, etc. (e.g., auto-assign issues, notify channels).
- AI Agents (Free+): Built-in AI for summarizing, drafting, and suggesting actions. All plans get basic AI agents.
- Triage Intelligence (Business+): AI-powered routing and prioritization of incoming issues.
- Linear Asks (Business+): AI assistant for answering questions about your backlog and project status.
Trade-off: Triage Intelligence and Linear Asks are Business-tier only. If you’re on Free or Basic, you get simpler AI features.
Security & Admin Features
Linear is enterprise-ready for most mid-market needs, but some advanced controls require Business or Enterprise.
Security & Compliance:
- SOC 2 Type II: Linear reports SOC 2 Type II compliance.
- GDPR: Linear states GDPR alignment and offers an EU data region option.
- HIPAA: Business Associate Agreement (BAA) available on request.
- Audit Logs: Available for the last 3 months.
- Encryption: TLS 1.2 in transit, AES-256 at rest.
Identity & Access:
- SSO: Google SSO included.
- SAML/SCIM: SAML and SCIM are listed under the Enterprise tier; confirm contract-specific requirements during procurement.
- Passkeys: Supported for passwordless login.
- Domain Claiming: Enforce all users with your domain join your workspace.
- Login Restrictions: Limit allowed login methods.
- IP Restrictions: Whitelist IPs for workspace access.
Data Residency:
- Choose US or EU at workspace creation.
Source: https://linear.app/security
Decision rule: If you need SAML, SCIM, or IP restrictions, confirm entitlements for your target plan—these features typically require Enterprise tier. For SOC 2 and GDPR, all paid plans are covered.

Linear Pricing (2026)
| Plan | Price | Teams | Issues | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 2 | 250 | Unlimited members, Slack + GitHub, AI agents |
| Basic | $10/user/month (annual) | Unlimited | Unlimited | All Free features, more teams, unlimited history |
| Business | $16/user/month (annual) | Unlimited | Unlimited | Triage Intelligence, Insights, Asks, Issue SLAs, Zendesk/Intercom |
| Enterprise | Custom (annual) | Unlimited | Unlimited | Dashboards, SAML/SCIM, advanced security, migration support |
Source: https://linear.app/pricing
Who Should Stay Free?
- Early-stage startups with <10 members and <250 active issues.
- Side projects or small product teams not needing advanced integrations.
- Teams testing Linear before committing to a paid plan.
Who Should Upgrade?
- Basic: Teams needing more than 2 teams or >250 issues, or wanting unlimited issue history.
- Business: Teams that want SLAs, AI-powered triage, Zendesk/Intercom, or Linear Insights.
- Enterprise: Organizations requiring SAML/SCIM, custom dashboards, IP restrictions, or migration support.
TCO Scenarios: Cost by Team Size
| Team Size | Basic (Annual) | Business (Annual) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 seats | $1,200/year | $1,920/year | Budget for seat growth as team scales |
| 50 seats | $6,000/year | $9,600/year | Consider admin/security tier requirements |
| 100 seats | $12,000/year | $19,200/year | At this scale, evaluate Enterprise for SAML/SCIM |
| 250 seats | $30,000/year | $48,000/year | Request Enterprise quote for volume discounts |
Hidden cost prompts to consider:
- Procurement time: How long will vendor review and security assessment take?
- Admin overhead: Do you need SAML/SCIM provisioning? This typically requires Enterprise tier.
- Change management: Factor in onboarding, training, and migration costs.
- Seat policies: Confirm how contractors, guests, and read-only users are billed—policies vary by plan.
Linear Scoring Rubric
We evaluate issue trackers across 8 weighted criteria. Below is how Linear scores for three common buyer personas.
| Criterion | Weight | Startup (10–50) | Scale-up (50–200) | Enterprise (200+) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed/Developer Experience | 15% | 9/10 | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Workflow Fit | 15% | 8/10 | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Reporting/Portfolio | 15% | 6/10 | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Integrations Breadth | 10% | 7/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Slack/GitHub Depth | 10% | 9/10 | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Admin/Security | 15% | 7/10 | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| AI Usefulness | 10% | 7/10 | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| TCO at Scale | 10% | 8/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Weighted Total | 100% | 7.7/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.6/10 |
How We Score (0–10)
- 0–3 = Poor: Significant gaps or blockers for typical use cases.
- 4–6 = Adequate: Functional but unremarkable; may require workarounds.
- 7–8 = Strong: Meets or exceeds expectations for most teams.
- 9–10 = Best-in-class: Industry-leading in this dimension.
What earns a 9+ in key criteria:
- Speed/DX: UI feels instant; keyboard-first navigation; minimal friction for power users.
- Slack/GitHub Depth: Strong Slack workflow support plus tight linkage to developer workflows; validate your preferred GitHub status automation in trial.
- Admin/Security: SOC 2 reported, HIPAA BAA available, SAML/SCIM on Enterprise, audit logs, data residency choice.
Decision Tree: Choose Linear If / Avoid If
Choose Linear If:
- Your team ships software weekly and values speed over configurability.
- You live in Slack and GitHub—deep integration matters.
- You want minimal setup and opinionated workflows.
- You’re a product/engineering team of 5–200.
- You don’t need complex portfolio management or custom dashboards.
Avoid Linear If:
- You need SAML/SCIM and can’t justify Enterprise tier cost.
- Your org requires heavy compliance workflows or approval gates.
- You need deep portfolio-level reporting (consider Jira Align).
- You’re a non-software team (marketing, support, HR).
- You have 500+ seats and TCO is a concern.
Consider Alternatives:
- Jira: Deep customization, broad app marketplace, portfolio management.
- Shortcut: Balanced flexibility and simplicity, slightly lower cost.
- GitHub Issues: Native to developer workflow, free with GitHub.
- Asana / ClickUp: Broader use cases, non-engineering teams.
30-Minute Evaluation Plan
Use this checklist to validate Linear for your team during a free trial. No prior access required—this is what you should test:
| Test | What to Validate | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Slack → Issue Intake | Create an issue from a Slack message. Confirm thread sync. | Issue appears in Linear with Slack link. |
| 2. GitHub PR Linkage | Open a PR linked to an issue. Check status transition. | Confirm the issue reflects PR linkage and the workflow behaves as you expect (status updates/automation if enabled). |
| 3. Triage Flow | Submit 5 test issues. Triage and assign using keyboard. | All issues triaged and assigned in <2 min. |
| 4. Cycle Planning | Create a cycle. Add 5 issues. Review burndown. | Cycle burndown chart populates correctly. |
| 5. Reporting Needs | Identify 3 reports your leaders need weekly. Check if Linear Insights covers them. | Confirm coverage or plan API export. |
| 6. Admin Controls | Check SSO options. Confirm SAML/SCIM availability for your target plan. | Entitlements match your security requirements. |
| 7. Migration Test | Import 50 sample issues (CSV or API). Validate field mapping. | Data imports cleanly with no major loss. |
If any test fails or is unclear, contact Linear sales or consult documentation before committing.
Linear Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Designed to feel extremely fast in daily use | Limited customization (by design) |
| Keyboard-first UX saves time for power users | Narrower integration ecosystem than Jira |
| Strong Slack integration (faster intake, fewer status-check pings) | Dashboards require Enterprise |
| Clean, opinionated design reduces decision fatigue | No granular custom fields or workflow branching |
| Strong GitHub sync (bi-directional) | Audit logs limited to 3 months |
| AI features built-in (not just marketing) | Seat policies vary by plan—confirm before procurement |
| SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA on request) | Not ideal for non-software teams |
Who Linear Is Best For
- Engineering-driven startups (5–100): Teams that ship weekly and want speed, not configuration.
- Product teams using GitHub/Slack: Deep integrations make handoffs seamless.
- Keyboard-power-user cultures: If your team hates the mouse, Linear is a natural fit.
- SaaS and software product companies: Linear’s workflows map well to continuous delivery.
- Teams escaping Jira complexity: If you’re drowning in configuration, Linear is a reset.
Teams already using simple task managers like Todoist or Trello for personal productivity may find Linear’s team-focused workflows a natural step up for collaborative engineering work.
Who Should Avoid Linear
- Enterprise PMOs needing portfolio management: Linear’s Initiatives are lightweight; not a substitute for Jira Align or similar.
- Support or marketing teams: Linear is issue-centric, not built for task lists or campaigns. Consider Freshdesk for support workflows or multi-department platforms.
- Teams requiring heavy compliance workflows: If you need every issue to go through 7-step approval gates, Linear will frustrate you.
- Large orgs needing custom reporting: Without Enterprise dashboards, you’ll rely on API exports.
- Organizations with 500+ seats: Per-seat pricing adds up fast; evaluate TCO carefully.

Best Linear Alternatives
If Linear isn’t the right fit, here are the top alternatives to consider. For a broader view of SaaS software options, see our category hub.
| Tool | Best For | Pricing | Key Differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jira | Enterprises, complex workflows | Free–$9+/user/month | Deep customization, broad app marketplace |
| Shortcut | Mid-sized product teams | Free–$8.50+/user/month (annual) | Balanced flexibility and simplicity |
| Asana | Cross-functional project work | Pricing varies by tier | Workflow automation, broader use cases |
| ClickUp | All-in-one work management | Pricing varies by tier | Feature density, customization |
| GitHub Issues | Developers, OSS projects | Free (with GitHub) | Native to developer workflow |
| Plane | Self-host, open source | Free (self-host) | Full control, no SaaS lock-in |
Note: For Asana, ClickUp, and Plane, always confirm current pricing directly with the vendor.
For teams prioritizing simplicity over feature depth, Basecamp offers a flat-rate pricing model that eliminates per-seat cost concerns. Client services firms may prefer Teamwork for its billable hours tracking and client-facing project portals.
Linear vs Jira
| Dimension | Linear | Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Speed/UX | Designed for fast, keyboard-first use | More mouse-heavy, can feel slower |
| Customization | Opinionated, limited | Extremely configurable |
| Setup Time | Minutes | Days to weeks for full config |
| Integrations | Focused (Slack, GitHub, Zendesk) | Broad app marketplace |
| Portfolio Management | Light (Initiatives) | Strong (Jira Align, Advanced Roadmaps) |
| Pricing (10 users) | $100–$160/month | $0–$90+/month (Cloud) |
| Best For | Fast-moving product teams | Enterprises, regulated industries |
Trade-off: Linear is faster and cleaner out of the box. Jira is better for large, complex orgs with diverse workflows or heavy compliance needs. If you’re a 50-person startup, Linear will likely feel better. If you’re a 5,000-person enterprise, Jira’s ecosystem and flexibility may matter more.
Assumptions: Linear totals are derived from per-seat pricing on annual billing; Jira pricing varies by edition and billing cycle.
Source (Jira pricing): https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing
Linear vs Shortcut
| Dimension | Linear | Shortcut |
|---|---|---|
| UX/Speed | Slightly faster, cleaner | Fast, but less polished |
| Flexibility | More opinionated | More configurable |
| Slack Integration | Deeper (Agent on Business+) | Good, but less advanced |
| Reporting | Insights (Business+) | Built-in, slightly more flexible |
| Pricing (10 users, annual) | $100–$160/month | $85–$120/month |
| Best For | Teams wanting speed + simplicity | Teams wanting balance of both |
Trade-off: Linear is faster and has a more refined UX. Shortcut offers slightly more flexibility and lower per-seat cost at the Team tier. If your team prioritizes keyboard-driven speed, Linear wins. If you want more reporting options without jumping to Business tier, Shortcut is worth a look.
Assumptions: Linear totals are derived from per-seat pricing on annual billing; Shortcut pricing varies by edition and billing cycle.
Source (Shortcut pricing): https://www.shortcut.com/pricing
Linear Review – FAQs
Is Linear free?
Yes. Linear has a Free plan at $0.
What are Linear’s Free plan limits?
The Free plan includes unlimited members, but it’s limited to 2 teams and 250 issues.
How much does Linear cost per user in 2026?
Basic is $10/user/month billed yearly, Business is $16/user/month billed yearly, and Enterprise is custom annual pricing.
When should I upgrade from Free to a paid plan?
Upgrade when Free limits start affecting behavior—most commonly when you need more than 2 teams, exceed 250 issues, or want deeper reporting/security features.
Does Linear work with Slack?
Yes. You can create issues from Slack, use /linear commands, and get notifications and rich previews. The Linear Agent for Slack is available on Business/Enterprise.
Does Linear integrate with GitHub?
Yes—Linear supports a tight workflow with GitHub so engineering work can be linked to issues. If you rely on automated status transitions, validate the exact behavior during your trial.
Does Linear support SAML and SCIM?
Linear lists SAML + SCIM under the Enterprise tier. Confirm any contract-specific requirements during procurement.
Is Linear SOC 2 compliant?
Linear reports SOC 2 Type II compliance.
Does Linear support HIPAA?
Linear states HIPAA support with a BAA available by request.
Where is Linear’s data hosted (US or EU)?
You can choose US or EU as the data region at workspace creation. If data residency is a requirement, confirm the region choice and implications before rollout.
What are Linear’s biggest limitations?
The main trade-offs are limited deep customization, lighter portfolio-level reporting, and Enterprise-gated features like dashboards and some admin controls.
What are the best alternatives to Linear?
Common shortlists include:
GitHub Issues/Projects if your workflow is primarily code-first and developer-native
Jira if you need deep customization, complex workflows, and enterprise governance
Shortcut if you want a simpler tracker with balanced flexibility
Final Verdict
If you are:
- A product or engineering team (5–200) that values speed, clean UX, and Slack/GitHub integration → Linear is a strong fit.
- A startup escaping Jira’s complexity → Linear is likely a relief.
- An enterprise with heavy compliance or portfolio needs → Evaluate Jira or Linear Enterprise carefully.
- A non-software team or need heavy customization → Consider Asana, ClickUp, or Shortcut.
Linear is not the cheapest or most flexible option—but for fast-moving software teams, it’s one of the fastest and most pleasant to use daily.
For teams evaluating knowledge management alongside issue tracking, our best knowledge base software guide covers tools like Document360, Nuclino, and Tettra that integrate well with development workflows.






